home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- From: khollis@bitsink.gbdata.com (K. Hollis)
- Subject: Re: what about this?
- Date: Sun, 12 Jun 1994 20:13:45 +0000 (GMT)
- In-Reply-To: <m0qCwYn-0000qBC@sdf.lonestar.org> from "Evan K. Langlois" at Jun 12, 94 03:55:00 pm
- Mime-Version: 1.0
- Precedence: bulk
-
- > No, implementing a double "keyboard" click does not mean a delay exactly.
- > It means you have another evnt_multi with a small timer event which is
- > not the same as a delay. A delay is fixed and cannot be short-cutted.
- > If you type something else or click or move the mouse before the GEM timer
- > expires then you have a single key-click plus the next event, if the next
- > event is another keyboard click, and is the same exact key as before, THEN
- > you have a double-key-click. If the timer expires, then you have a single
- > key click.
-
- This is really a bad idea; I don't mean to mock you or anything but think
- about it. What if a person accidentally types a word with TWO letters in
- it which are exactly the same, and it's not meant as a double-key click?
- Say, for instance, "Stopping", "Cancelling", "Accidents", etc. You get the
- idea. It doesn't make sense.
-
- -- Ken
-
-